Disclosure: PortfolioPilot is a technology product of Global Predictions Inc, a Registered Investment Advisor. You must subscribe to receive personalized investment advice.
Alexander Harmsen is the Co-founder and CEO of PortfolioPilot. With a track record of building AI-driven products that have scaled globally, he brings deep expertise in finance, technology, and strategy to create content that is both data-driven and actionable.
Reviewed by
PortfolioPilot Compliance Team
The PortfolioPilot Compliance Team reviews all content for factual accuracy and adherence to SEC marketing rules, ensuring every piece meets the highest standards of transparency and compliance.
According to the FINRA Investor Education Foundation’s 2023 follow-up study of new investors, 70% of respondents said features that help them learn about investing are helpful—outpacing entertainment-style features by a wide margin. Yet many still assume that all wealth platforms function the same way.
There are important differences between hybrid advisor models like Empower (formerly Personal Capital) and AI-driven platforms like PortfolioPilot.com. This overview explains how each works, where biases may appear, and when one might suit an investor better.
Key Takeaways
Empower (formerly Personal Capital) combines free dashboards with human advisory upsells; PortfolioPilot provides automated analysis without commissions or product sales.
Investors using Empower may encounter advisor incentives tied to assets under management.
PortfolioPilot’s independence allows data-driven analysis, risk simulations, and tax-aware planning without hidden sales motives.
Both tools help investors visualize their wealth—but serve different user profiles: one for those seeking guided advice, the other for self-directed decision-makers.
Empower (formerly Personal Capital): Hybrid Dashboard Plus Advisory
Empower built its reputation on offering a free, visually appealing dashboard that connects bank accounts, investments, and retirement plans. This makes it popular with individuals who simply want to view their financial picture in one place.
However, the company’s deeper features are tied to human financial advisors who work under an assets-under-management (AUM) model. These fees are typically charged as a percentage of total assets, often around 1% annually, which can add up significantly over time. In addition, some investors have reported frequent outreach encouraging them to move more assets into managed accounts. For individuals who prefer to manage their own portfolios, this combination of ongoing costs and sales contact may not align with their preferences.
For some, this human touch provides reassurance. For others, it raises questions about objectivity and independence.
PortfolioPilot: AI-Driven Independence
PortfolioPilot takes a different approach. Instead of human advisors with potential commercial incentives, it uses AI-based analysis and simulations to provide insights. Like Empower (formerly Personal Capital), PortfolioPilot.com also offers a free dashboard for tracking accounts and net worth. The difference is that PortfolioPilot’s version is newer, designed with modern interfaces, and connects to a wide range of asset types while maintaining the same free access structure. The platform reviews an investor’s portfolio for:
Because PortfolioPilot does not make money from commissions or management fees, its analysis is focused on data. The subscription model can also be significantly less costly than traditional percentage-of-assets (AUM) arrangements, which often charge around 1% annually.
At-a-Glance Comparison
Below is a side-by-side look at how Empower (formerly Personal Capital) and PortfolioPilot differ:
Feature
Empower (formerly Personal Capital)
PortfolioPilot
Core Model
Hybrid: free dashboard + advisor upsell
Free dashboard model + AI-driven analysis (similar to Empower’s free dashboard, but built more recently with a modern design)
Incentives
Advisory services tied to AUM (assets under management) fees
No commissions, no product sales
Asset Coverage
Traditional accounts + some alternatives
Brokerage, retirement, real estate, cash, and more
Value the comfort of a traditional AUM relationship.
PortfolioPilot, on the other hand, may appeal to investors who:
Prefer full independence in decision-making.
Want actionable insights without commission-based incentives.
Are looking for scenario modeling across diverse assets.
Hypothetical: Consider a mid-career professional with a 401(k), a taxable brokerage account, and a rental property. Using Empower, this person could see all accounts in one place, but may be encouraged to move assets under management with an advisor. With PortfolioPilot, the same person could receive an AI-driven analysis showing diversification gaps, hidden fees, and tax-aware rebalancing opportunities—without being pitched specific products.
Being objective is important. For self-directed investors, it helps to know if advice is linked to sales incentives or given independently. This can be the difference between feeling supported and feeling pressured.
Empower (Personal Capital) vs PortfolioPilot — FAQs
What percentage of new investors said educational features are more helpful than entertainment-style ones?▼
About 70% of new investors indicated that learning-oriented features were helpful, outpacing demand for entertainment-style elements by a wide margin.
How does Empower (formerly Personal Capital) generate revenue beyond its free dashboards?▼
Empower operates on a hybrid model, combining free dashboards with advisory services tied to assets under management, creating incentives to gather client assets.
What incentive risks might investors face when using an AUM-based advisory service?▼
Under an AUM model, advisors are incentivized to bring more assets under management, which may raise questions about objectivity and independence of recommendations.
What independence claim does PortfolioPilot make compared to Empower’s hybrid model?▼
PortfolioPilot does not earn commissions or management fees. Its AI-driven analysis emphasizes independence by focusing on analysis, tax efficiency, and risk simulations without sales motives.
What types of assets can PortfolioPilot analyze that go beyond traditional accounts?▼
PortfolioPilot reviews brokerage, retirement, real estate, and cash holdings, offering broader coverage compared to traditional dashboards.
How does PortfolioPilot surface tax-related opportunities for investors?▼
PortfolioPilot highlights strategies such as tax-loss harvesting and asset location to improve tax efficiency, without pitching specific financial products.
What risks can PortfolioPilot detect within a portfolio?▼
It identifies diversification gaps, hidden fees in mutual funds or retirement plans, and resilience under different market scenarios.
Is Empower the same as Personal Capital?▼
Yes. Empower acquired and rebranded Personal Capital. Investors searching for Personal Capital alternatives are now effectively comparing Empower’s hybrid model with other tools like PortfolioPilot.
How does Empower’s dashboard function without advisory upsells?▼
The dashboard connects bank, investment, and retirement accounts to give a consolidated financial view, but deeper features often lead to advisory services under an AUM fee model.
When might Empower’s approach fit certain investors better?▼
Empower may appeal to those who want direct access to human advisors, prefer outsourcing decisions, or value the comfort of a traditional AUM relationship.
How does PortfolioPilot deliver scenario modeling compared to Empower?▼
PortfolioPilot uses AI-driven simulations to stress-test portfolios against factors such as inflation, interest-rate changes, and retirement timelines. Empower relies more on human advisor recommendations.
What planning tools does Empower emphasize compared to PortfolioPilot?▼
Empower focuses on budgeting and retirement projections, while PortfolioPilot emphasizes risk simulations, fee analysis, and tax-aware planning.
Why might self-directed investors prefer PortfolioPilot over a hybrid model?▼
Self-directed investors may value full independence and automated, data-driven insights that avoid commission-based incentives tied to human advisors.
What potential trade-off exists in Empower’s free dashboard model?▼
While the dashboard is free, using its advisory services can create a financial relationship where incentives lean toward moving assets under management.
How do both Empower and PortfolioPilot help investors visualize wealth?▼
Both platforms provide tools for viewing financial holdings, but Empower emphasizes a consolidated snapshot, while PortfolioPilot pairs visualization with analysis and scenario analysis.
How is objectivity treated differently between Empower and PortfolioPilot?▼
Empower’s human advisors may have incentives linked to AUM fees, whereas PortfolioPilot’s AI-driven platform provides analysis without commercial sales pressure.
In the hypothetical example, how would Empower handle a mid-career investor’s accounts?▼
Empower would display all accounts together, but the investor may be encouraged to place assets under management with an advisor.
In the same scenario, how would PortfolioPilot analyze the investor’s accounts?▼
PortfolioPilot would use AI-driven analysis to show potential diversification gaps, hidden fees, and tax-aware rebalancing opportunities, without recommending specific products.
How optimized is your portfolio?
PortfolioPilot is used by over 30,000 individuals in the US & Canada to analyze their portfolios of over $30 billion1. Discover your portfolio score now:
Global Predictions provides investment advice only through its internet-based application, PortfolioPilot, and only to individuals who are advisory clients of Global Predictions pursuant to written advisory Client Agreements ("Advisory Services"). The publicly available portions of the Platform (i.e., the sections of the Platform that are available to individuals who are not party to a Client Agreement - including globalpredictions.com and portions of portfoliopilot.com) are provided for educational purposes only and are not intended to provide legal, tax, or financial planning advice. To the extent that any of the content published on publicly available portions of the Platform may be deemed to be investment advice, such information is impersonal and not tailored to the investment needs of any specific person. Nothing on the publicly available portions of the Platform should be construed as a solicitation or offer, or recommendation, to buy or sell any security. All charts, figures, and graphs on the publicly available websites are for illustrative purposes only. Before investing, you should consider whether any investment, investment strategy, security, other asset, or related transaction is appropriate for you based on your personal investment objectives, financial circumstances, and risk tolerance. You are also encouraged to consult your legal, tax, or investment professional regarding your specific situation. Registration does not imply a certain level of skill or training. Investing involves risk. The value of your investment will fluctuate, and you may gain or lose money.
The contents of the Platform may contain forward-looking statements that are based on management's beliefs, assumptions, current expectations, estimates, and projections about the financial industry, the economy, or Global Predictions itself. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of the underlying expected actions or future performance and future results may differ significantly from those anticipated by the forward-looking statements. Therefore, actual results and outcomes may materially differ from what may be expressed or forecasted in such forward-looking statements.
Note: our use of the term AI refers to all artificial intelligence models used including large language models, proprietary economic models that incorporate regression or dynamic factors, and machine learning methods like supervised learning.
1. As of February 20, 2025 2. As of February 20, 2025 3. $30B Assets on Platform as of February 20, 2025. Aggregated across all plans (including the free plan). Assets on Platform represent the total value of connected and manually inputted accounts (including assets like real estate and private equity) and does not in any way represent Asset Under Management as Global Predictions does not manage any client funds.
5. Comparison made to an individual with $1M AUM, paying an "average wealth manager fee" of 1.02% based on a 2023 study by AdvisoryHQ. 1.02% * 1M = $10,200 per annum. PortfolioPilot Annual Gold pricing is $20/mo * 12mo = $240 per annum. 240/10,200 – 1 = ~98% lower. Actual fees paid to any individual financial advisor will depend on specific financial circumstances and arrangements.
7. The 1.94% referenced figure represents the average calculated monthly continuous tax-loss harvesting gain over a 4-year period from 2018-2021 in the 2024-published JP Morgan report titled "Continuous tax-loss harvesting yields more potential for tax savings" (link).
8. Case studies presented are hypothetical scenarios and intended for illustrative purposes only. They do not represent an actual client, investment or experience, but rather are meant to provide an example of the intended investment process and methodology. An individual's experience may vary based on his or her circumstances. There can be no assurance that the Firm will be able to achieve similar results in comparable situations. No portion of this case study is to be interpreted as a testimonial or endorsement of the Firm's investment advisory services. The information contained herein should not be construed as personal investment advice.
9. The financial advisor described in this marketing language is referring to you, the reader. PortfolioPilot is meant to be an aid to the self-directed investor. "Complete financial advice" refers to the fact that PortfolioPilot includes estate planning, tax optimization, net worth visualization, and scenario modeling, not just investment recommendations. See globalpredictions.com/disclosures for descriptions of conflicts of interest, use of AI, bias, and any other disclosures for Global Predictions Inc.
10. This analysis is based on data from publicly available reports, academic studies, and articles. Sources include Mullainathan et al. (2012): Study highlighting biases in financial advice and its misalignment with client interests; Morningstar (2024): Report on typical update frequencies from financial advisors; Bodnaruk and Simonov (2014): Research on the limited impact of financial expertise on investment outcomes; Financhill: Insights on hidden fees in financial advising, including expense ratios and transaction costs, as noted by Warren Buffett; Foerster et al. (2014): Study on the costs of financial advice, including average AUM fees of 2.43%.
11. $11M number calculated as 2024 YTD TLH savings study conducted across 24,000 PortfolioPilot users on November 18, 2024.
12. Based on assumptions and projections that may not reflect actual outcomes.