Disclosure: PortfolioPilot is a technology product of Global Predictions Inc, a Registered Investment Advisor. You must subscribe to receive personalized investment advice.
Mint Alternative for Investment-Focused Financial Tools
By
Alexander Harmsen
Alexander Harmsen is the Co-founder and CEO of PortfolioPilot. With a track record of building AI-driven products that have scaled globally, he brings deep expertise in finance, technology, and strategy to create content that is both data-driven and actionable.
Reviewed by
PortfolioPilot Compliance Team
The PortfolioPilot Compliance Team reviews all content for factual accuracy and adherence to SEC marketing rules, ensuring every piece meets the highest standards of transparency and compliance.
When Mint announced it was shutting down in 2023, millions of Americans rushed to find an alternative. At its peak, the app had more than 3.6 million monthly active users, according to Intuit. For many, it was the go-to tool for budgeting, tracking bills, and keeping a clear view of everyday spending.
The challenge is that tools made for tracking expenses are not always meant for investment planning. Mint was great for keeping an eye on spending, but it fell short for people who wanted to test their portfolios, include taxes in their plans, or look ahead to retirement. Because of this, many investors are now unsure where to go next.
This article compares Mint with PortfolioPilot.com, which builds on basic net worth tracking by adding portfolio analysis, tax-aware planning, and long-term scenario analysis.
Key Takeaways
Mint was built for budgeting, not investing. It helped track cash flow, but offered little in terms of portfolio analytics or tax planning.
PortfolioPilot addresses long-term wealth questions. It analyzes portfolios, runs simulations, and highlights tax impacts without selling financial products.
Different audiences, different goals. Budget-conscious households may want tools like Mint, while investors aiming to optimize portfolios may find PortfolioPilot more relevant.
What Mint Offered - and What It Didn’t
Mint was popular because it made budgeting simple: linking accounts, categorizing transactions, and nudging users about bills. For people looking to control spending, it served as a free and user-friendly dashboard.
However, Mint did not:
Analyze portfolios for risk or diversification
Integrate tax optimization strategies
Provide scenario forecasts (like inflation shocks or retirement income planning)
For investors, this meant Mint often served only as a starting point—not a full solution.
What PortfolioPilot Brings Instead
PortfolioPilot works differently. Instead of tracking daily spending, it helps self-directed investors look at their whole financial situation.
Some of the key features include:
Portfolio Analysis: Can help flag concentration risks, hidden fees, and areas where diversification could be improved.
Scenario Modeling: Allows investors to see how different factors, like retirement timelines, inflation, or interest-rate changes, might affect outcomes.
Tax-Aware Insights: Surfaces strategies such as tax-loss harvesting or asset location, without selling products.
Personal Recommendations: PortfolioPilot provides tailored investing recommendations, highlights fee drag across accounts, and tracks total net worth across multiple asset types - including brokerage, retirement, real estate, and alternatives.
PortfolioPilot emphasizes independence and data-driven insights, making it useful for investors who want clear information without added sales pressure.
At-a-Glance Comparison
Here’s how Mint and PortfolioPilot differ at a glance:
Advanced analytics, risk analysis, and diversification insights
Tax Integration
None
Built-in tax optimization and scenario modeling
Business Model
Free, ad-driven, with upsell pathways
Subscription-based, no commissions or product sales
Choosing Between the Two
For households mainly looking for help with cash flow and bill reminders, Mint’s approach worked well. Today, that role can often be filled by budgeting apps or tools built into banking platforms.
For investors more focused on building and protecting wealth, PortfolioPilot provides a different kind of solution. It emphasizes independence, transparency, and data-driven insights to support long-term financial decisions.
The main takeaway from Mint’s shutdown is that financial tools are not all the same. Budgeting dashboards and portfolio analysis each have their own uses. Investors who try to use one tool for both needs often end up disappointed. It is better to choose the right tool for the right job, whether that is a simple expense tracker or a portfolio-focused platform like PortfolioPilot.
Mint vs PortfolioPilot — FAQs
How many monthly active users did Mint have at its peak before shutting down?▼
Mint reached over 3.6 million monthly active users at its height, making it one of the most widely used budgeting platforms in the U.S.
When did Mint officially shut down, and what triggered the search for alternatives?▼
Mint shut down in 2023, prompting millions of Americans to look for alternatives for budgeting and investment-related financial tools.
What type of financial management was Mint primarily designed for?▼
Mint was designed for budgeting, focusing on linking accounts, categorizing transactions, and tracking bills, rather than portfolio analytics or tax planning.
Did Mint provide risk analysis or diversification checks for portfolios?▼
No. Mint did not analyze portfolios for risk exposure or diversification gaps; it focused solely on cash flow and expense tracking.
How did Mint handle tax planning or tax-loss strategies?▼
Mint did not integrate tax optimization or tax-loss harvesting strategies, limiting its usefulness for long-term investment planning.
What portfolio-specific analysis does PortfolioPilot include that Mint lacked?▼
PortfolioPilot can help detect concentration risks, hidden fees, and diversification weaknesses, which Mint did not address.
How does PortfolioPilot model inflation or interest rate changes in portfolios?▼
PortfolioPilot uses scenario modeling to show how variables such as inflation, interest-rate shifts, or retirement timing might affect portfolio outcomes.
What distinguishes PortfolioPilot’s business model from Mint’s?▼
Mint operated free with ad-driven upsells, while PortfolioPilot uses subscriptions without commissions or product sales, emphasizing independence.
Did Mint offer retirement planning projections for users?▼
No. Mint tracked expenses and balances but did not provide retirement income forecasts or simulations.
How does PortfolioPilot address retirement-focused investors differently?▼
PortfolioPilot allows stress-testing retirement timelines and spending needs, offering insights into how portfolios may support long-term goals.
What audience was Mint primarily built for?▼
Mint was built for households tracking cash flow and bills, not for investors seeking in-depth asset management or tax planning.
Who is PortfolioPilot designed to serve compared to Mint?▼
PortfolioPilot targets self-directed investors managing assets who want analytics, tax-aware planning, and forecasting, rather than just budgeting support.
What independence claim does PortfolioPilot make compared to hybrid advisory platforms?▼
PortfolioPilot emphasizes independence by not earning commissions or relying on upselling advisory services, unlike many hybrid financial tools.
How did Mint generate revenue from its users?▼
Mint relied on ad-driven revenue and upsell pathways, offering free budgeting tools while steering users toward promoted financial products.
Can PortfolioPilot run simulations for shocks like inflation surges?▼
Yes. PortfolioPilot’s scenario modeling helps investors test outcomes under inflation spikes, interest-rate changes, or retirement shifts.
What key gap did investors face when relying on Mint for wealth building?▼
Mint often served only as a starting point, since it lacked portfolio analysis, diversification checks, or integrated tax strategies.
What is the central distinction in purpose between Mint and PortfolioPilot?▼
Mint answered “Where is my money going?” by tracking spending, while PortfolioPilot answers “What does my portfolio mean for the future?” through analysis and planning.
How optimized is your portfolio?
PortfolioPilot is used by over 30,000 individuals in the US & Canada to analyze their portfolios of over $30 billion1. Discover your portfolio score now:
Global Predictions provides investment advice only through its internet-based application, PortfolioPilot, and only to individuals who are advisory clients of Global Predictions pursuant to written advisory Client Agreements ("Advisory Services"). The publicly available portions of the Platform (i.e., the sections of the Platform that are available to individuals who are not party to a Client Agreement - including globalpredictions.com and portions of portfoliopilot.com) are provided for educational purposes only and are not intended to provide legal, tax, or financial planning advice. To the extent that any of the content published on publicly available portions of the Platform may be deemed to be investment advice, such information is impersonal and not tailored to the investment needs of any specific person. Nothing on the publicly available portions of the Platform should be construed as a solicitation or offer, or recommendation, to buy or sell any security. All charts, figures, and graphs on the publicly available websites are for illustrative purposes only. Before investing, you should consider whether any investment, investment strategy, security, other asset, or related transaction is appropriate for you based on your personal investment objectives, financial circumstances, and risk tolerance. You are also encouraged to consult your legal, tax, or investment professional regarding your specific situation. Registration does not imply a certain level of skill or training. Investing involves risk. The value of your investment will fluctuate, and you may gain or lose money.
The contents of the Platform may contain forward-looking statements that are based on management's beliefs, assumptions, current expectations, estimates, and projections about the financial industry, the economy, or Global Predictions itself. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of the underlying expected actions or future performance and future results may differ significantly from those anticipated by the forward-looking statements. Therefore, actual results and outcomes may materially differ from what may be expressed or forecasted in such forward-looking statements.
Note: our use of the term AI refers to all artificial intelligence models used including large language models, proprietary economic models that incorporate regression or dynamic factors, and machine learning methods like supervised learning.
1. As of February 20, 2025 2. As of February 20, 2025 3. $30B Assets on Platform as of February 20, 2025. Aggregated across all plans (including the free plan). Assets on Platform represent the total value of connected and manually inputted accounts (including assets like real estate and private equity) and does not in any way represent Asset Under Management as Global Predictions does not manage any client funds.
5. Comparison made to an individual with $1M AUM, paying an "average wealth manager fee" of 1.02% based on a 2023 study by AdvisoryHQ. 1.02% * 1M = $10,200 per annum. PortfolioPilot Annual Gold pricing is $20/mo * 12mo = $240 per annum. 240/10,200 – 1 = ~98% lower. Actual fees paid to any individual financial advisor will depend on specific financial circumstances and arrangements.
7. The 1.94% referenced figure represents the average calculated monthly continuous tax-loss harvesting gain over a 4-year period from 2018-2021 in the 2024-published JP Morgan report titled "Continuous tax-loss harvesting yields more potential for tax savings" (link).
8. Case studies presented are hypothetical scenarios and intended for illustrative purposes only. They do not represent an actual client, investment or experience, but rather are meant to provide an example of the intended investment process and methodology. An individual's experience may vary based on his or her circumstances. There can be no assurance that the Firm will be able to achieve similar results in comparable situations. No portion of this case study is to be interpreted as a testimonial or endorsement of the Firm's investment advisory services. The information contained herein should not be construed as personal investment advice.
9. The financial advisor described in this marketing language is referring to you, the reader. PortfolioPilot is meant to be an aid to the self-directed investor. "Complete financial advice" refers to the fact that PortfolioPilot includes estate planning, tax optimization, net worth visualization, and scenario modeling, not just investment recommendations. See globalpredictions.com/disclosures for descriptions of conflicts of interest, use of AI, bias, and any other disclosures for Global Predictions Inc.
10. This analysis is based on data from publicly available reports, academic studies, and articles. Sources include Mullainathan et al. (2012): Study highlighting biases in financial advice and its misalignment with client interests; Morningstar (2024): Report on typical update frequencies from financial advisors; Bodnaruk and Simonov (2014): Research on the limited impact of financial expertise on investment outcomes; Financhill: Insights on hidden fees in financial advising, including expense ratios and transaction costs, as noted by Warren Buffett; Foerster et al. (2014): Study on the costs of financial advice, including average AUM fees of 2.43%.
11. $11M number calculated as 2024 YTD TLH savings study conducted across 24,000 PortfolioPilot users on November 18, 2024.
12. Based on assumptions and projections that may not reflect actual outcomes.